
February
2001
Web
Site Index and Navigation Center
INS National Firearms Unit Ballistic Gelatin Test Protocol
Attachment One
INS NATIONAL FIREARMS UNIT BALLISTIC PROTOCOL SURVEY
Please fill out this survey and turn it in before the end of the symposium. Your thoughts regarding all of these issues are important to us. We will compile the data and send a report to you.
There is no space provided for your name, but you may include it if you wish. Your name will not be used in connection with any of the survey data gathered.
What gelatin protocol should be used for mixing gelatin?
Block size __________ (6x6x16?)
Mix temperature __________ (cold to hot, hot to cold "x" degrees F)
Calibration velocity range _____ fps to _____ fps
Calibration range in inches _____ inches to _____ inches
Mix percentage 10% 20% other _________
Circle the minimum number of test phases which should be included for procurement testing.
Bare gelatin
Lightly clothed gelatin
heavily clothed gelatin
4x denim substitute
Plywood
Sheetrock
20 gauge steel
Compound angle windshield
20 yard clothed gelatin
20 yard windshield
Other __________
What is the minimum amount of acceptable penetration throughout the range of tests?
8 inches in all tests
9 inches in all tests
10 inches in all tests
12 inches
Other _________
What is the maximum amount of penetration that should be specified in all tests?
14 inches
15 inches
16 inches
18 inches
Other __________
How should test results be weighed?
Bare gelatin _____%
Heavily clothed gelatin _____%
4x denim gelatin _____%
Light clothed gelatin _____%
Plywood _____%
Sheetrock _____%
Compound windshield _____%
20 yard clothed _____%
20 yard windshield _____%
At what distance into the gelatin should peak projectile expansion or upset occur?
2 inches
3 inches
4 inches
Other _____
Should test results include classification of the recovered projectile regarding deformation characteristics of the heaviest portion of the projectile that penetrates deepest into gelatin?
INS Categories
Active/passive fragmentation system?
Other _____
Both
None
Which of the following measurements should be recorded?
projectile expansion
projectile remaining weight
depth of gelatin penetration
length of temporary cavity
width of temporary cavity
mid-point of temporary cavity
stress cracks in gelatin
general location of major projectile fragments
specific location of projectile fragments
length of wound channel of major projectile fragments
muzzle velocity/energy of test round
exit energy/velocity of test round through short block
other _________
This is your chance. What do you want to see in the INS Protocol? Continue on next page if necessary.
Short block tests for rapid expansion?
Temporary stretch cavity internal volumetric measurement (liquid volume).
Measurement of maximum stretch cavity from high speed photography.
Variable measurements based on each test protocol?
Other __________
Based on the discussions during this symposium, what further research does the INS have to do before establishing a ballistic gelatin protocol?
You have had an opportunity to observe and listen to our ideas about ammunition and ammunition testing during the past two days. What weaknesses do you see in our perceptions, and how should we correct them?
Do your believe the INS is justified using the rationale that since we are convinced of the effectiveness of the .357 magnum 125 grain JHP performance, that it is desirable to develop a test protocol that tests to this standard? If not, why not?
Do you see the creation of a Protocol designed to test high energy, medium penetration projectiles as unnecessary? Will this create insurmountable problems for industry? For the INS?
We like the Fuller Index system as a quick and easy reference for performance predictability.
Should the Fuller Index rating be included in our reports? Yes No
Should some other rating system be used? __________
Should no rating system be used? Yes No
Attachment Two
INS BALLISTIC PROTOCOL SURVEY MATRIX
The following Matrix was prepared using the responses of the symposium participants. The Matrix follows the basic layout of the questionnaire with some slight modifications made for formatting purposes.
Twenty-two participants submitted responses to the survey. Some of the participants did not respond to some of the questions because the questions may have been outside their particular area of expertise. Others did not respond to certain questions because they did not have an opinion on the issue being addressed.
The survey was a very useful tool and greatly assisted NFU staff in determining the type of tests and measurements that should be conducted, and the value that should be assigned to the tests and measurements.
|
Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader required to read survey responses.
|
Delivering you informative multimedia essays about the "battlefield problem-solving" tactical aspects of armed self-defense.
Copyright
© 1998 - 2001 Firearms Tactical Institute. All Rights Reserved.
FirearmsTactical™, Salus
In Periculo,
and logo are trademarks of Firearms Tactical Institute.